Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Baxter's avatar

As a Californian, I freely admit that it took years for me to clock that Washington wine was a thing. I think my brain replaced the word with "Oregon" when I saw it, because that made more sense. I went quite a while conflating the two. But now that I'm fully aware of Washington wine, I think part of the issue is price: most Washington wines are already selling at current Paso prices, or the low to mid end of Napa/Sonoma prices. Yet they haven't made their mark beyond their borders. Who's going to "discover" Washington wine for $40 - $90 a bottle? I feel like they jumped the price gun before it was ready for that jump, nationally speaking. The locals likely already have the proper appreciation, but that's going to be a huge barrier for spreading wider. Especially given the issue that rising wine prices is creating in the broader wine market.

Expand full comment
Fred Gold's avatar

We have a similar (but slightly different) identity problem here in Southern Oregon. I don't think we necessarily need a "signature" variety, because there are quite a few grapes that do very well here, in various little microclimates. Where Southern Oregon suffers is that it is too often identified with the Willamette Valley, which DOES have a signature grape in Pinot Noir. A large part of the wine-drinking community view that as the signature grape of the entire state, not realizing that there are other growing regions that do not rely on Pinot Noir, but that produce a diversity of excellent wines from other grapes.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts